Government of Czechia

Policy topics Government of Czechia is active on

What Government of Czechia has said (80)

• 2026-06-16 “Thank you. Marilena and I will speak in English in the beginning and I'll switch to check in a while. Thank you very much for the books and thank you for your efforts. Uh, we think that figures, uh, will bring new dynamics into the discussion. And I very much share what Pyotr Seraphin said, uh, about the compromise. Certainly, we all are pleased by some parts, and we also dislike some parts, but generally it's a very well balanced compromise. Uh, we appreciate your effort. And we think that we are getting to the point where actually it is difficult to reach more progress at a different level than amongst leaders. So it's actually good that it goes to Yuko on on Thursday and the discussion will continue there. And let me say a little bit about what we see. Very positive and what we would like to see more in there in check that.”
  EU political integration
• 2026-06-16 “Thank you very much, Marilena, and thank you for your work. And, uh, congratulations on the success. And I will continue in Czech. We are really happy to see that in the compromise text and in an echo box. Uh, many of our proposals were incorporated. So that's a great news. And I would like to point out that it's obvious that this is a partial general approach. So there are some outstanding elements that have to be finalized. So, uh, with this understanding, Uh, let me continue. We need a balanced and early agreement on this whole package, which is very important for the multiannual financial framework. Therefore, we are ready to support all three partial general approaches. It's a part of a of an overall package and compromise, including the box that we have been discussing. Obviously, we expect the Negro box to stay stay stable just like the previous speaker. We would like to say that we have a national statement on the NRP. Explaining our position and key concerns that we find very important. And we would like to have this annexed to the minutes of this meeting, I would like to point out that this shouldn't be a constraint for the future work of the council and the preparatory bodies, uh, on regulations regarding the SAP and CMO. It's very important to continue the discussion on outstanding, um, agricultural questions, for example, the transitional period. We also need a more robust framework that will ensure a more balanced geographical spread in ECF. I would also like to support the Hungarian statement and the Slovenian statement. I'm sorry.”
  Agriculture (green)
• 2026-06-16 “What we find important is that we have allocations maintained for NRP, the national regional partner plans, because the lowering that has had been suggested by the Commission was for some member states, including the Czech Republic, quite significant. And the consequences that were possible at the time. Uh, have definitely been expressed by the group of Friends of Cohesion. I appreciate the effort of the presidency to find a systematic solutions that takes into account the situation of the member states, who are entitled to the cohesion fund resources. Now we have a new allocation, a top up, and we see this as a step in the right direction. We think this is an important element that should be maintained in the text. On the other hand, we regret that there have been some cuts in the CF facility. We think this is an important program not just for the Czech Republic, but also for the EU as a whole. In the narrow box, there are still some areas where the progress has only been limited, but we think we need to carry on on the level of the leaders. And it's the following areas. We think the brackets with the safety net that have been deleted that was precocious with. We need to talk about this further. Also CSR in .36. We still think we shouldn't link that to everything, but only the selected subset also brackets with the minimal level of environmental and social uh, objectives is not timely, especially with the environmental objective. We think this is too ambitious and ahead of time. We are also skeptical when it comes to transferring from, uh, home affairs to the national allocation. But we still think that the rule of automatic decommitment rule that has been changed. We think this is fine, but the one year time limit isn't enough. We think we need to move on and extend this period. Also, we want to participate constructively in further negotiations and achieve a balanced, uh, package. We think that is a good basis for further work. The leaders can work on this basis with no further problems. Thank you.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• “21:22 – 16:23:26): Thank you very much. Now the floor is open and I will start with the Czech Republic, January. Dear Commissioner, dear colleagues, thank you, Presidentsi, for your update on the progress of discussion regarding to to proposed regulation of EUSPA. I would like to underline that we consider the establishment of a dedicated regulation for the agency to be of a great importance and as it strengthens legal certainty ensure to long term continuity and stability of the agency. Today's political discussion has once again clearly demonstrated that Europe must make to a maximum use of the capacities it already possess and continue strengthening its capabilities into operation of space system and to use of space data and services and space security. There are precisely 2 areas where EUSPA has proven expertise and where it should continue to play a central role across all dedicated EU space system and infrastructures. Here, we see a major role for the European Commission to ensure and manage union space system, member states to provide with the capacities and capabilities to strengthen common solution as well as for ESA to design to develop space system and for EUSPA in operations, utilization, and security of the system. At the same time, EUSPA should continue to cooperate closely with member states and with the European Space Agency, ESA, in building resilient space system and to strengthening Europe's overall position in space. We teleporting to presidency for steering an open and constructive discussion onto use power regulation, which we are ready to support actively through our proposals and contributions. Thank you. Thank you. And we now have 1 more. Germany, Helen.”
  EU competences on space policy
• “Thank you very much for the floor, Mr. President. I think the gradual recovery of large carnivore populations, especially bears, wolves and lynx, [00:32:00] is doubted and is undoubtedly a success of our nature conservation effort. These species are crucial for the proper functioning of forest ecosystems. The return of carnivores gives rise to, uh, sensitive challenges, and we must not jeopardize these successes. And we need to have international cooperation within the EU. We have to discuss at all levels and share examples of good practice. Uh, [00:32:30] such as, for example, Slovenia said the protection of large carnivores, the uniform monitoring of their population and conflict prevention, including flexibility in dealing with problem situations. Of course, these carnivores know no borders and therefore we think the EU level solution is needed. Uh, we need to, uh, enhance, uh, support in order to [00:33:00] protect livestock. And we have to reflect the increased costs for economic operators. Therefore, we support a deeper and more comprehensive discussion among member states on issues related to large carnivores, including the proposal of the Commission for the reclassification of the Commonwealth and the annexes of the Berne Convention. And I would like for the Commission to explain the issues related to the [00:33:30] possible changes to the level of protection of large carnivores, for example, adjustment of financial mechanisms to ensure preventive measures and compensation for damage, as well as systemic changes to ensure that the requirements for ensuring the favorable status of the species continue to be met. Thank you, thank you.”
  Nature protection and restoration in the EU
• “Dear chair, to commissioner, ministers, and colleagues, to begin with, I would like to thank the Cyprus presidency for the selected topic and the opportunity to comment on the EU work plan for culture beyond 2026. The EU work plan for culture is the council's most important instrument defining the outlook and framework for European cooperation in the field of culture policies. The exceptional nature of this instrument is based on the fact that it is, important for a systematic dialogue between member states and the European Commission. We are prepared to reengage actively in the development of the new work plan. We want to build on and offer our experience from the recent past during our presidency of the Council of the EU. The negotiation process was based on an open discussion and careful listening to each other and showed that even with different national priorities, common framework with real added value can be achieved. In the context of the development of the EU work plan for culture for the next period, Czechia is in favor of maintaining continuity on key topics, in particular, as regards the working conditions of artists and cultural professionals and to ensure equal access to culture for all. However, we have to respond to the new challenges that the cultural sector is currently facing. We also would like to implement priorities in line with the culture compass for Europe. Among the priorities is undoubtedly the responsible and ethical use of AI in the culture and creative sectors and strengthening digital skills and media literacy. We should bear in mind that the cultural sector is heavily affected by the development of AI. There's also a growing list of related issues such as the impact of AI on creation copyright, the value of newly created works of art, threats to labor market, the concept of ethics in artistic creation or ensuring equal access to new digital tools. Our aim should be for technology to serve culture and not to push it out of our lives. Unfortunately, as global development shows, we still need to discuss the crisis preparedness in the cultural sector in a context of continued social polarization, increasing pressures on media and cultural institutions. Continued attention should be paid to the protection of freedom of artistic expression, which is 1 of the fundamental pillars of a democratic society. We also must bear in mind the issue of long term and strategic investments in cultural capacities and infrastructure without which a truly sustainable development of the cultural sector cannot be ensured and which would be better defended if supported by specific cultural data and statistics. Finally, I would like to stress that Czechia will continue to support efforts to ensure that culture is seen as a fully fledged and respected area. In European policies, we believe that such an approach strengthens not only the cultural sector, but also cohesion, resilience, and at the global level, the culturally and historically unique democratic character of Europe as a whole. Thank you for your attention.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “In the particular value its chapter on permitting renting processes that effectively cuts the time and red tape for our businesses in key net zero sectors. Here we have no time to waste regarding the discussed safeguard on nuclear. I would [00:37:00] like to refer to common statement that we have joined with other member States, like together with France. To conclude, in a spirit of compromise, the Czech Republic can support the general approach as put forward to the presidency. Thank you.”
  EU policy on permitting for renewable energy projects
• “In general, I support looking for new funding sources over and above the cap. However, my concern is about flexibility and the real possibilities of using these funds. So I would like to ask the commission what will be the rules for their use and what will be the accessibility of the new sources of income. Also, there is no reference to a credit points and carbon based conception and the link to the to funds over and above the cap. How will this work in practice, the basic point for me is not to distort the single market. There has have to be aligned conditions in every member state. We need an environment that will be innovation friendly and technology friendly. Third countries as China, the USA, Brazil invest massively in technological development and this should be a priority for the EU as well. We have to have a motivational approach. We have to keep the existing farmers, farmers, but we need to attract the young as well. I welcome the announced digital strategy for the EU farming. We need to invest in infrastructure in rural areas and we have to invest into smart platforms. We have 300 and 500km border with Russia and Belarus. We have to support the rural areas there as well. Thank you.”
  Agricultural funding
• “Thank you very much. Thank you for giving me the floor. We clearly support the intention to revise the directive, especially as regards labelling of honey blends. We are a long term supporter of Slovenia in this respect. The labelling of honey has been ineffective for a long time, misleading for the consumer. But it is not just about the origin of honey. Honey is about is among the most counterfeited foodstuffs. The directive is currently too rigid. So we clearly support a revision of the Directive and its modernisation. The Czech Republic has pointed out the need to revise the directive, and we do not. We shouldn't modify merely the rules on labelling. Thank you.”
  Food labelling harmonisation at EU level
• “Well, thank you for the floor and for including our AOB item on today's agenda. Highly appreciated. Extremely important for all point of view together with how you mentioned Bulgaria, Greece, Poland, Romania and Slovakia. And tomorrow in the morning we discuss it also with the other representatives and and country. Thank you to your colleagues to to Hungary and the others. We would like to draw the Council's attention to a significant challenge faced by energy intensive industries in the EU and the European Union. The current proposal to revise European Union ETS benchmarks reduces free allowances. This would increase carbon costs for energy intensive industries at a time of high energy prices and strong global global competition. These sectors are fundamental part of Europe's industry, or lose of their competitiveness would undermine both economic and climate climate objectives. We call for realistic and pragmatic approach on the revision of benchmarks, including including a temporary freeze of benchmark values at the levels from 2025 In that regard. We have. We are supporting. Towards the French Spanish recent paper. We also advocate for enhanced financial instruments such as the Modernization Fund. Thank you.”
  Carbon leakage support
• “39:01 – 12:40:11): I would like to thank the commission for presenting this package. The Czech Republic supports the objective of facilitating the choice and purchase of travel documents and enhancing market transparency. However, there are different starting conditions and different levels of preparedness across member states. For example, in The Czech Republic, the market is liberalized and several carriers compete on the main routes. At the same time, I would not like the proposal presented to be based solely on the premise that it is impossible to travel by train in Europe today. Experience, for example, on the long distance Prague Brussels route shows that this is possible with a single ticket. I am aware that this may not be the standard, and I will only be happy if the purchase of tickets in Europe itself does not discourage travel by train. However, we must be vigilant in simplifying purchases so as not to worsen the situation for passengers and railway undertakings. For example, banning broken tickets can lead to higher fares as it would limit the use of special offers on individual sections. Thank you.”
  EU support of rail transport
• “Thank you for the follow. Ashton, I would just like to thank our Italian and German colleagues for including this topic in our today's discussion at our today's meeting. We can fully join their position, and we also support all of the activities of the Commission, which are aimed at strengthening trade partnerships with third countries and supporting the health guarantee system. I believe that our common objective is to maintain smooth trade by avoiding unjustified bans on the distribution of products, including the export of live cattle. At the same time, I support the use of vaccination to combat the spread of diseases among animals. And in this respect, I agree with the Commission's call to provide maximum support to pharmaceutical manufacturers in improving their vaccines at the EU level.”
  Animal diseases prevention and management in the EU
• “Thank you very much for the floor. First and foremost, it is necessary to emphasise that our industrial resilience in general starts with competitive energy prices, as has already been mentioned by the Minister earlier today. When it comes to your first question, we strongly believe that the Steel and Metals Action Plan was a step in the right direction. Its success is very dependent on actual, predictable implementation. At the same time, we support all measures which would address global overcapacity and import pressures while ensuring the proper functioning and coherence of the EU ETS system and Cbam, which does not go against the objective of economic growth and stability. Strengthening the competitiveness of our chemical industry requires urgent and coordinated action. Clear policy coherence between climate and chemical industrial legislation must be ensured in terms of timelines, requirements and objectives. In addition, support for innovation and investment is really essential. Measures such as targeted funding or incentives for low carbon and safe chemicals, processes and technologies, while keeping the principle of technological neutrality, can help companies transition while maintaining global competitiveness. Faster permitting procedures and clearer guidance would also support this goal. Regarding the automotive package, we truly appreciate the effort to introduce greater flexibility and although we welcome the proposed changes, we did them insufficient to fully reflect market realities and to safeguard the global competitiveness and strategic autonomy of the automotive industry in the EU, particularly in the view of the 2030 emissions target tightening.”
  Carbon leakage support · Energy (green transition)
• “Mister chairman, thank you for the floor. I would like to support my this initiative that the Czech Republic is a part of. Autonomous mobility is not merely a technological trend, but is a key pillar to the future development of mobility. If we wish to maintain Europe's leading position in the strategic sector and to remain competitive in the automobile industry, we need to accelerate innovation and create a predictable and uniform regulatory environment. We consider the timing of this initiative very good. Since January, we have legislation allowing for level 3 of autonomous vehicles, and we are getting ready for level 4. We have experience of autonomous driving in Europe. Therefore, it's important to support this initiative and cooperate across countries. We need to closely cooperate with also transport companies, cities and, of course, the industry. Thank you.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Dear colleagues, I would like to begin by expressing my thanks to the presidency for the work done so far. Progress has been made in the right direction compared to the commission proposal. However, there are still reasons why we consider the compromise text too ambitious and difficult to implement. We recognise the need for a gradual shift towards zero emission mobility. Nevertheless, we must be cautious about [00:30:00] making rushed decisions that could undermine the public support for green transition and endanger the competitiveness of European industry and road transport sector. This is why we believe that the proposed 2030 emissions target is too ambitious, and we would prefer it lowered to 35%. Currently, electric heavy duty vehicles are still in the early stages of development and the necessary charging infrastructure [00:30:30] remains limited in the Czech Republic. Road transport is the primary method of moving goods, significantly outweighing rail transport. While we suffer the modal shift and rail development, a complete reversal of the current trend cannot be expected in the short term until 2030. A massive increase in battery and hydrogen heavy duty vehicles, requiring an extensive network of charging and filling stations, [00:31:00] will be necessary to reach the proposed target. We fear such rapid expansion is not feasible in many regions, and could lead to reduced availability of transport services or higher costs of goods. We thus welcomed the change of the review of the regulation to 2027. It will enable the Commission to reflect on the actual development in the area of zero emission vehicles and the state of recharging and filling infrastructure. [00:31:30] [00:31:30] Following the result of such a review, the Commission should evaluate the feasibility of achieving the set reduction targets. On the issue of urban buses, let me stress that this is a priority for us. Last year, a total of 5300 buses were produced in the Czech Republic, a number that increases annually. Per capita, this makes us European as well as world leader in bus production. We also need to take [00:32:00] into account the initial high purchasing price of the electric buses, and the time needed for a gradual renewal of the public transport fleets. In line with what this. What is embedded in the Green Vehicle Directive. Consideration should also be given to the impact of the transition to zero emission buses on public transport efficiency and accessibility, especially in peripheral and rural areas. Therefore, it remains [00:32:30] crucial for us to postpone the 100% target for urban buses to 2035, which, despite broad support, has not yet been reflected in the text. Such change would provide bus manufacturers and contracting authorities with more time to prepare the necessary investments. We hope that this adjustment will be included in the text as a part of the reflection on today's debate. Additionally, we [00:33:00] regret that the compromise does not include a carbon correction factor. We see the CCF as a valuable medium term solution to help manufacturers continue delivering affordable vehicles. We would like to see the inclusion of CCF that would enhance technological neutrality and the use of carbon neutral fuels as key elements of decarbonisation in transport. Thank you for your attention.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Thank you very much indeed for including this item on today's agenda. I'd like to draw to your attention the ongoing negotiations in the proposal for Amendment of Reach regarding the ban on lead. In practice, this proposal would lead to a ban or significant restriction on lead used in the ammunition used by hunters and sports fishers. Of course, I realize how important it is to protect human health and the environment by reducing lead emissions. However, we must also take account of all the implications of this proposal, and we believe that first and foremost, it is vital and indeed unacceptable that the effect could be to jeopardise the European Union's defence capabilities and security, particularly in view of the current geopolitical situation. Furthermore, this proposal runs directly counter to the Europeans endeavours union's endeavours to strengthen its defence industry and this proposal would also have a disadvantageous effect. And when it comes to substitutes for lead in ammunition, they do already exist. But their ballistic and wounding properties are different from lead and this could negatively impact game and human health. And of course, um. This could also have an impact when it comes to an appropriate response to African swine fever. Furthermore, this could lead to an increase in the price of not just a fishing tackle, but also a fish and fish products. Um, leisure activities such as recreational fishing and various fish related sports could be could significantly decline. And furthermore, I believe that this proposal does not contain sufficiently detailed information on the characteristics of lead substitutes and their effect on the environment and human health. So I'd like to appeal to the Commissioner to consider whether at this juncture, they should in fact withdraw this proposal. Colleagues, if you agree with the concerns I've just outlined, we would very much welcome your support in the negotiations of this proposal in the relevant committee. Thank you very much.”
  Chemicals regulation
• “I would like to thank the presidency for choosing this important topic. I believe that enhancing competitiveness of traditionally strong industries must be of significant importance for the whole union. Our decarbonisation goals are important, but their achievement must be economically, technologically and socially feasible and should benefit our competitiveness and secure. We need an open discussion on how to adjust decarbonisation trajectory to reflect the current reality and ensure a competitive future for our economy. That is why Czechia is strictly opposing the proposed 90% emission reduction target for 2040 2030. That is why, for example, EU, ETS and Cbam should take into account the needs of traditional sectors and the problems they face, especially the high energy costs. We should not fear discussing unorthodox and creative ways to lower them to support their gradual and necessary modernization and decarbonisation. Eu ETS allowances price needs to be predictable and market manipulation must be avoided. It is also important to decouple the price of electricity from the price of natural gas. As highlighted in the report, the prime examples are the automotive sector and steel production, which face not only the challenges of the twin transition, but also extreme and unfair. International pressure. A challenging situation in the automotive industry should be a reminder of how things should not be done.”
  Energy (green transition)
• “At the same time, we need to keep in mind that not everything can be solved by the cap. I therefore support the concept of national recommendations as a non legally binding strategic instrument that sets out key challenges and priorities, not a list of requirements from the Commission. The recommendations should should help to justify support in areas that are not included in the cap envelope. In particular, I'm referring to ACS and rural development. However, the recommendations should also address topics that are fundamental to the Cap but not eligible in the current legislative proposal. This mainly concerns food security and support to food businesses. I believe that it is not logical that these processes cannot be financed that way. However, it is necessary to set up interventions. Also their conditions and information systems. All of this must be decided on the basis of recommendations. Should we still expect the implementation of the plans to start from the 1st January 2028? The recommendations would need to be finalised by the summer. This is not realistic because the legislative process is still ongoing and it will not be concluded soon. Therefore, I believe that we need to start addressing the transition period realistically. I firmly believe that our common objective is to make the new programming period realistic and efficient. Thank you.”
  Agricultural funding
• “I'd like to thank the Commission for presenting the action plan, the construction of high speed rail is one of the priorities of the Czech Republic. Delivering a truly integrated European high speed rail network is not only an efficient and sustainable alternative to other to other modes of transport. Shifting some traffic to high speed rail will also free up capacity for local and trade transport, thereby helping to relieve the burden on the congested railway infrastructure. We appreciate that the action plan contains concrete steps to move these concepts forward. However, an ambitious goal requires adequate funding. The Czech Republic considers it necessary to set up the EU financial support system accordingly for future EU budget periods, starting with the next Multiannual Financial Framework, which is absolutely essential. We also expect that the coordination of investments with cross-border relevance will be strengthened at EU level. Thank you.”
  Energy (green transition)
• “The methodology methodology for low carbon steel must be transparent and consulted with member states and the sector so that it does not ultimately favour uncompetitive technologies. A key priority for us is a five year Averaging for emissions for the years 2028 to 2032 instead of three years, which better? Corresponds to manufacturer's investment cycles. For genuine, genuine technological neutrality. We should also count, uh, vehicles running exclusively on neutral fuels as zero emission and reflect them. It them in the super credit system for super credits to have a real motivation effect. Uh, the coefficient, the coefficient should be increased to above 1.3. We should freeze the utility factor for plug in hybrids in Euro six and seven. Um, otherwise we will unnecessarily undermine technologically. Uh and technology that is increasingly popular and is also being improved by manufacturers to ensure a longer electric range. European industry faces intense competition from Asia. Overly rigid regulation would accelerate the outflow. Outflow of investment and jobs from the EU and paradoxically weaken our ability to finance the green transition. Finally, the next revision must be must come before 2030, not in 2035, so that we can respond in time to real market developments. The Czech Republic is ready to work constructively on solutions that protect the European economy and affordable mobility for citizens. Thank you for your attention.”
  2035 ICE phase-out: strict zero-emission target vs. flexibility for carmakers · Road transport environmental policy
• “Thank you very much, Czeslaw. Dear colleagues. Yes. I too would like to thank you very much indeed for providing this document. We believe that it really is the beginning of a new road towards where we need to be in the agriculture and food sector. We need to ensure the strategic security of the sector for the whole of the European Union. And with this in mind, the Commissioner has our unequivocal support. I would like to make four comments. If I may, we would certainly agree that we do need to remove excessive regulation and administrative burdens, because that hampers investment in businesses. And we think that it's an important step to aim at strengthening competitiveness as well. However, that really does need to be put into practice. It's not enough simply to cut back on one regulation, whereas 2 or 3 more may be needed in its place and on certificates. I would also just like to say that we need to be bold when it comes to incentives, and we also need to be bold when it comes to achieving the ambitions that we've set for ourselves, be it the IG, the deforestation and other similar issues. And likewise, I would also like to appeal for a technical and financial resilience. Colleagues have already mentioned that we need to have ambitions which are balanced and achievable.”
  Agriculture (green)
• “Thank you. Chair. Um, let me start with Ukraine, which is obviously a very important topic also for the Czech Republic. The Czech Republic has done a lot, is doing a lot, and will continue to do so at the national level. And I think it is important that we strengthen also our support at the EU level. In this sense, I would warmly thank the Commission for preparing the new instrument for the support of Ukraine. We think that the help to Ukraine is the most important part, if not the only one, which would legitimize the MFF revision. Normally we would not be very favourable in the MFF review resulting in the MFF revision, but probably the this instrument would legitimize it. On the Commission proposal on own resources, let me say that our position remains reserved. The new own resources, if introduced, should keep the system simple, stable, fair and predictable. We are still analysing the current proposal, but we are not convinced that the package on the table fulfils these criteria. We would have plenty of comments, like many of my predecessors, especially on the adjusted ETS and on the gross operating Surplus sauce. I will not repeat them. We will raise them at a technical level, but we are still ready to continue the technical analysis and discussion. Nevertheless, we are also of the view that given how much technical work is in front of us, that maybe the presidency timetable, namely to put this topic on the October European Council seems to us a little too ambitious. Let me also say that we think that the discussion on new own resources should be kept strictly separated from the one on the MFF mid-term review. Thank you very much.”
  Own EU resources
• “Dear Mr. Chair, the the minister, uh, I would like to express my thanks to the Ukrainian delegation for all the information provided. And I can proudly say that I have been authorized by the Czech government, uh, to ensure you about the continuous Czech support, uh, of the Ukraine against Russian aggression and also about our unflagging [00:24:30] solidarity with the Ukraine, especially with Ukrainian youth. Slava Ukraini.”
  Russia-Ukraine conflict (10th term)
• “Thank you Marquis. I support French and German colleagues in a matter of note opening negotiation of Fida regarding the issue of the retail financial strategy and retail financial package. I support the position of my French colleague. Negotiations need to be reopened, opened so that consistency between a political agreement and its technical implementation in the legislative text is ensured. Thank you.”
  Financial regulation
• “Thank you for giving me the floor. Louis. Madam Commissioner, I would like to thank the European Commission for this supplementary study. We are currently analysing this extensive text. However, on a preliminary basis I can say that our worries concerning the impact on the agricultural sector have not been completely dispelled. Like some other member states, the Czech Republic is also missing [00:23:00] clearer quantification of these impacts in terms of production, imports and food prices. What's also unacceptable for us is the reduction of the production of crops, which are maybe less significant in terms of food and feed security. However, they play a very significant role on the national level. In the case of our country, it's, for example, hops. What's questionable is also the accessibility and effectiveness of [00:23:30] alternatives to chemical plant protection products, especially in the field conditions we believe that we still need to further consider this study as well as further modifications of the proposal at the working party of the Council. As for the first question, I believe that the final text of the regulation should provide the Member States with as much flexibility as possible and make it possible to set out suitable steps to reduce risks and pesticide load. I believe that the discussion must [00:24:00] be focused, especially on the definition of sensitive areas. [00:24:04] It should make sure that we have sufficient area of land for production also in light of the current development on the commodity markets. What's also open is the question of reduction targets for the use of pesticides. What's important is to take into account the past development in specific regions as well as special needs for protection. The farm to fork strategy [00:24:30] is the basis for the objectives. We suggest 50% for the entire EU, and I believe that it makes sense for individual Member States to contribute to this target. To make sure that food security and self-sufficiency is not at risk. At the Council, Working party member states submit a lot of good amendments, and I believe that we will be able to find a compromise for all parts of the text. The Czech Republic, as well as myself, are prepared to contribute [00:25:00] on the basis of a pragmatic approach. As for your second question, I believe that what we still consider to be of key importance is compliance with clear principles of integrated plant protection. And in this respect, I would like to thank the Swedish presidency for all of the work they have done. Thank you for your attention and lots of success to the Spanish presidency.”
  Reduction targets for pesticides
• “As for the proposal on clean corporate vehicles, we take note of its general objectives. But at the same time, we consider the proposed regulation to be problematic in terms of the choice of instruments, the degree of harmonisation and the insufficient consideration of national specificities. We support pragmatic steps within the package, such as the temporary adjustment of the credit mechanism for heavy duty vehicles and the battery booster strategy as a framework to strengthen the European battery value chain. To conclude further simplification. Regulatory predictability and balanced and rational approach. Combining climate ambition with industrial resilience will be essential to ensure the competitiveness of EU industry. In this respect, may in the EU requirements must be carefully calibrated to avoid disrupting supply chains and undermining European manufacturers. As has been already stated by many speakers before me, thank you very much.”
  Corporate fleet electrification: binding zero-emission quotas vs. voluntary approach
• “Thank you chair. We are of the view that the package is a step in the right direction, as many other colleagues already said. We all know that the deep and liquid securitisation markets are important for the EU's strategic objectives, including financing the green and digital transitions, financing defense, supporting SMEs and enhancing financial stability through properly calibrated risk transfer mechanisms. However, our preliminary view is that we should consider being even more ambitious. The framework could better support the creation of deep, globally connected liquidity pools by reducing unnecessary barriers for international investors and aligning the EU rules with global standards. We also encourage further steps, for example, exploring possibility of accepting accepting materially similar due diligence or limiting the due diligence related penalties for institutional investors at the EU level. Thank you.”
  Financial regulation
• “55:09 – 11:56:36): you, mister chairman. Distinguished commissioner, dear colleagues, I would like to thank the Belgian delegation for the presented document. The Czech Republic fully supports this initiative. ERTMS is a key prerequisite for strengthening the capacity, safety, and interoperability of European rail network. However, there are significant obstacles in its implementation. Despite the progress achieved under the 4th railway package and the strengthened role of ERA, the certification approval and testing procedures remain complex, fragmented, and difficult to predict. This is slowing down the deployment of ERTMS, undermines investment certainty, and limits benefits for capacity, efficiency, and cross border interoperability, weakening the the union's transport objective. Objective. We would therefore support measures to standardize ERTMS, simplify certification and approval procedures, as well as the stability of TSI specification. That is the only way to ensure interoperability. That's why we call on the European Commission to support the harmonization of requirements and documentation procedures at EU level. Thank you.”
  EU support of rail transport
• “Dear Cheslav. Dear colleagues, I would like to thank the presidency for this debate and I would like to thank the Commissioner for presenting the vision. I think this is a good basis. However, the coordination of the future legislative and non-legislative work will be necessary. As for the first question is, it's very important to continue cutting red tape and having rules that are easy to understand and that won't keep our farmers from their actual work. Looking at this vision, what worries me is that there won't be a much reduction of regulation because there are many, many new initiatives. I think that we are at a junction? Either there will be deregulation and cutting red tape, or there will be new and new initiatives that will bring new costs with them. Or do you think that it's regulation that will attract new generation to agriculture? In this context, I hope that the promised simplification packages will really bring relief to farmers and the state administration, for example. It's really important to simplify the deforestation register regulation. The future setup of the cap have to be has to be realistic and feasible. We must not forget that there are different circumstances in the individual member states. And now I'm coming to my essential point. On the one hand, there are many new initiatives in the vision, but what we completely miss is data and analysis.”
  Agriculture (green)
• “Thank you. I would like to thank the Spanish presidency for organizing the discussion and activities on the long term vision [00:44:30] of for rural areas, and I believe that the council conclusions are a good result. I believe that this is a key priority. However, now it will be important that we are able to put our ideas into practice. This will stop the de-population of rural areas, and we need to be able to use all the tools that our policies offer. [00:45:00] A balanced and dynamic development of rural areas requires attractive conditions for the young generation, both in rural areas and in agriculture and the related sectors. This requires accessible services and the attractiveness of these sectors, which we can increase by supporting new technologies. However, we need to see agricultural functions not only as [00:45:30] production based, but also in terms of its key role in landscape forming and creating a good environment for life. However, we also need to provide good broadband connection in these areas. I believe that this document is a balanced compromise and it can be put into practice. It contains all the key issues and challenges of rural areas and emphasizes the role of agriculture, [00:46:00] agri food and rural areas, including local action groups. I also welcome the passages that focus on decreasing the administrative burden. The Czech Republic agrees with the council conclusions. Thank you.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• “Thank you Maria. Thank you for your excellent job. Um, dear friends. Colleagues, uh, this is my first and only moment in which I will use my mother tongue, because I guess you deserve to hear it. Uh, so let me switch to Czech at the moment. Sorry. So. The Czech Republic welcomes the fact that there's a stress to react to the present and future challenges we need to accomplish our political priorities. It's very important for us that these priorities are explicitly stated in point one. These are new priorities, but also policies based on the treaties. That's cohesion and agriculture. The Czech Republic agrees that a simplified MFF should make implementation more transparent and avoid overlaps, which is fundamental to use the budget more efficiently. Changes should lead to cutting red tape on all levels, so we welcome that this is repeatedly stated in the nego box. However, our concern is about the impact of merging cohesion and the cap within one framework. We think that this could lead to unforeseeable complications due to the fact that the two policies have different rules and objectives. We also need to pay due attention to the part of the box that deals with governance. That's about the role of the member states, that's point 17 and the potential governing mechanism. Point 16. The Czech Republic supports a rule of law and the system of protection of the values of the EU. Point 22 heading to the Czech Republic agrees that EU attention should be paid to new priorities and challenges. It is our opinion that we need to use the potential of the whole of the EU.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• “Dear Minister, Commissioner Johansson, esteemed colleagues, thank you for the floor. The development of both transport and energy infrastructure is one of our key priorities in the next MFF, we have strongly advocated for preserving the Connecting Europe facility and securing sufficient funding for its transport and energy component. We therefore welcome the continuation of the CEF instrument and its significantly increased allocation. It is absolutely crucial for completing the core Ten-e networks, as well as for implementing the goals of the Electricity Grids package. This is true for interconnectors, but also for internal lines, facilitating greater trade across borders in energy. Cef plays a key role in completing and modernising of the core TNT network and adapting it to military mobility requirements. As the member states role in implementation process and further also work programs have been strengthened. We fully support the adoption of the partial general approach today, and the Council position sends a clear message that the Member States are committed to reinforcing transport and energy networks. Thank you.”
  Energy (green transition)
• “Thank you. Chair. Thank you Commissioner. Thank you for your comments. And I would like to thank the Polish as well as the preceding Hungarian presidencies for their tremendous efforts in the intensive negotiations on this compromise text. All of the meetings at the technical level were conducted with the utmost care to take into account the positions and suggestions of the Member States, and we highly appreciate that compared to the previous versions, the text of the proposal has been significantly improved. However, the Czech Republic still has some substantive reservations. We believe it would be preferable to continue discussing this at an expert level. However, like the Commission, we firmly believe that some issues will be resolved during the trilogues with the European Parliament. What we consider as the Czech Republic to be a key shortcoming is the inadequate creditor protection. For example, they are not adequately protected against dishonest debtors while using the pre-pack mechanism, which might result in the abuse of this procedure. At the same time, the Czech Republic considers it important to allow derogations from the provisions of title four governing the pre-pack procedures in emergency situations. The purpose is to ensure that creditors are protected from rushed sales of businesses in the event of distorted market conditions. We consider these shortcomings to be so significant that, like Belgium and Spain and others, we will abstain from voting on the proposal today and we will submit a statement for the council minutes. Thank you.”
  Financial regulation
• “Thank you, Chairman. I would also like to thank Francesco for this document. The Czech Republic considers the text as really interesting, because the text rightly points out how important the cap is and how important the cohesion policy [00:21:00] is for the rural areas. However, we need to find a way how to support those that are active in farming. We need to find the right way to reach sustainability and food security. I know full well we cannot entirely give up the Green Deal. However, we need to reconsider the objectives and a good timing of the implementation of potential changes or revisions on [00:21:30] behalf of the Czech Republic. I would like to support the opening of the topic of the wolf and habitats, because this topic is a hot issue among Czech farmers as well. We need an EU solution. Thank you.”
  Large Carnivores
• “Dear colleagues. As I've already said, this is one of the Czech Republic's priorities, and I believe that the EU has to quickly react to the dynamic development in biotechnologies, and let's have the potential of helping us reach a number of our EU goals, so we cannot keep restricting the usage of these innovative breeding techniques. This would decrease the competitiveness of European agriculture. The Czech Republic can fully support the direction the Spanish presidency has taken. We also believe it is key that we reach a compromise as [00:34:00] soon as possible, so I appreciate the current progress in the negotiation. As for the labelling of plants in category one, we believe that this should only be obligatory for seeds because current analytical methods make it impossible to distinguish between these plants and conventional plants. We are also against the discussed opt out for prohibiting cultivation of plants in some Member states. We believe we need to ensure [00:34:30] a level playing field and legal certainty. I understand that views of member states differ, but we need to start seeing these techniques as a way to ensure food sovereignty in the EU, which is our shared goal. We also have to keep focusing on scientific research, and we need to ensure that we don't see NGOs as the same as GMOs. I believe that we will manage to reach [00:35:00] an agreement in this year, and the Czech Republic will do its utmost for that. Thank you.”
  New Genomic Techniques
• “Thank you very much. President. Commissioner. Colleagues. I would like first and foremost, to thank the Belgian presidency for their excellent choice of a topic for today's debate. We very much welcome the fact that we get this opportunity to have this concrete debate about [00:02:30] this topic. We are very actively, uh, involved with the implementation of the AI act, and we have a broad range of associations involved in copyright, for example, who really appreciate our work because it strengthens the role of the creatives and they have more control of how their works are used. Of course, there's a lot of potential [00:03:00] when it comes to AI in the culture and creative sector, and there are many areas where we've already taken measures. In 2019, for example, we put forward a national strategy for AI. But of course it's a sector that is developing incredibly quickly. And so we're having a lot of in-depth work on an updated version of that strategy at the moment, and we hope that we'll have that before the end of the year. We [00:03:30] do think it's important to look at funding and financing. We have a czechinvest agency, a state agency for funding of these technologies. We support startups via these initiatives. And we're spending millions on that. We are creating projects for the use of AI within the cultural and creative [00:04:00] sector. Two. Now that all being said, we do know that there are difficulties that we're going to face as well and we are trying to address those. We need to make sure that cultural sector and and technologies are cutting edge technologies are both equally supported. We have the Creative Europe programme, for example, and the potential of AI has been recognised in that. So I think we should make more use of the potential that lies there. Since [00:04:30] 2023, we are supporting cross-sectoral programmes when it comes to training. For example, we have a lot set out for the coming years. For 2025, for example, we want to make sure that those working in the cultural and creative sector will be encouraged to actually use AI and new technologies, because it certainly that's certainly going to be important for the future of the sector. We need to promote [00:05:00] the creative potential that lies in people, and we also need to make sure that skills training and further training is available. We've got Culture Europe, for example. That's another project that we're working on at European level as well. So really, I'd like to thank the Belgium presidency again for raising this important topic. Thank you.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “Thank you very much, Madam Chair, Distinguished Commissioners. Dear colleagues, Dear Ministers, first of all, I wish to congratulate you, Madam Minister, on an excellent achievement on this proposal. You've reached a compromise. That is a balanced one for sure. Thank you also for the words of appreciation of the former Czech presidency. We've worked hard on this one. So here we are. As you may know, we have had some some issues when it comes to the collection of statistical data. And like many others around this table about the random checks on the online platforms compliance, we share doubts. I have to be honest. We share doubts about the inclusion of micro and small online platforms into the obligation to carry out random checks since those are exempted and we know very well the DSA and Article 31 and thus we believe similarly they should be exempted also here. But, you know, whilst in the spirit of compromise, we are able to support today the general approach with the hope that this situation can be remedied during the trilogues which you are best equipped for to successfully negotiate with these words, I wish to thank you once again, Madam, Madam Chair, and to wish you good luck. Thank you.”
  Digital platforms liability for harmful and illegal content
• “Prime Minister Commissioner colleagues Czech Republic welcomes the information shared by the Irish delegation and strongly supports the comprehensive revision of both the Tobacco Taxation Directive and the Tobacco Products Directive. We believe this is a timely and necessary step not only to strengthen the internal market and ensure appropriate taxation, but above all, to protect public health. A national level, the Czech Republic has already introduced excise duties on several novel products, including heated tobacco, e-liquids and nicotine pouches. Yet without harmonised EU rules, the impact of such measures remains limited. Looking ahead, we support a strict regulatory approach, one that encourages adult smokers to move away from combustible tobacco and at the same time ensures strong protection against youth uptake and new users put in place. I'd like to thank our French colleagues for having put forward some ideas about research, and I think we should follow up on those.”
  Smoking regulation
• “Thank you. I would like to thank you for all the intensive work in reaching a compromise on this file. I have long supported initiatives to strengthen the fight against VAT fraud at EU level during the preparation of this proposal. I stress the importance of some practical and technical aspects for effective functioning and implementation at Member state level. These issues have been addressed during the technical discussions. Therefore, I can support the proposal. Thank you.”
  VAT harmonisation
• “Thank you very much for the floor and for preparing this discussion. We believe that the measures contained in the strategy continue to provide an adequate framework to address the key challenges and achieve our goals. At this stage of the implementation, we do not consider it necessary to prioritize specific steps. We need a comprehensive approach. We're convinced that the current text of the Reach regulation offers a solid basis for the implementation of the strategy, and we don't see the need to make substantial changes. However, we do support its targeted revision, which will focus on the necessary changes, especially when it comes to speeding up and simplifying the permitting procedures. Riga. We considered it a priority to focus on replacing harmful chemicals with safer alternatives, to reduce risks to human health and the environment, and to promote reuse and recycling. However, many such substances do not have easy substitutes, and that places considerable demands on manufacturers. It's crucial to start implementing the concept of essential use, and to take into account potential risks and benefits in this way. We the additional regulatory burden on companies can be minimized and the competitiveness enhanced. We need to take into account the decarbonization of the chemical industry and the recommendations made in the Draghi report with regard to strengthening the financial and financing and building of infrastructure for hydrogen, we expect the next Commission to take these recommendations into account with the forthcoming Clean Industrial Deal, which should also provide a vision for the future development of the chemical industry in the EU. As part of the strengthening circular economy elements, we would also welcome a debate on low carbon waste hydrogen from chemical processes. We believe that we also need to deal with the challenges connected to the delay of implementation of the strategy, and we need to ensure that there are a sufficient number of experts available to the ECA agency. Thank you.”
  Chemicals regulation
• “Thank you very much. Czechia would like to focus on the legal certainty for children and adults in cross border situations. We definitely believe that it is good for the status and position of children to remain stable in cross border situations. So we are happy to see that we give attention to the enforcement and acceptance of authentic instruments and judgments. Also, we think it is good that we continue with technical negotiations. At the moment, we do not want to preempt our final position on this file because it may be different depending on how the negotiations go on. When it comes to our ability to support the compromise, there are two elements that are decisive. Firstly, it is a clear definition of the scope and key concepts and corresponding legal effects. We want to have a text that is legally clear, reduces the risk of divergent interpretations and which prevents the abuse of cross border situations. Secondly, rules have to be understandable, predictable, and also workable in practice for all competent authorities because the rules are not only going to be applied by courts, but also by other authorities, including civil registries. So if we do not have clear rules, there is a risk of fragmentation in application, which would undermine the very objective of the proposal. Experience shows that if a matter is so sensitive, we shouldn't rush and seek a solution that is sustainable in the long term and acceptable to all member states. I think that the best way forward is to look for a compromise and be guided by the best interest of the child and legal certainty throughout the union. So we remain engaged in technical negotiations, we are ready to find an agreement. Thank you.”
  Jurisdiction conflicts between EU and national courts
• “Thank you for the floor. Uh, the AI act is a key, groundbreaking legislative proposal that aims to protect the human rights, health and safety. [00:17:00] And at the same time, it should stimulate innovations that how we constructed that. And Czechia realizes on several issues that the position of the Council and the Parliament are quite far apart. And to find a provisional agreement, it will be necessary to make compromise. And we support the presidency in its efforts to reach a solid agreement with the Parliament. However, the final text needs to be balanced and should maintain key underlying principles [00:17:30] such as following a risk based approach, be future proof and technologically neutral, and impose minimal administrative burden. We hope that these main principles will be applied especially to the part of the AI act regulating the general purpose AI systems and modules. Given the recent development of this part of the proposal and limited available assessments of its potential impact, a careful approach is needed [00:18:00] towards regulating technology that is undergoing such a rapid development. That being said, Czechia hopes that the goal legislators will find a solid agreement on the remaining open issues and that the negotiations of the AI act will be soon concluded and the agreement should provide increased legal certainty, boost innovations and uptake of AI, while ensuring the full respect of the fundamental rights of our citizens. [00:18:30] Thank you.”
  Artificial Intelligence
• “32:31 – 10:34:57): you very much. Czechia would like to focus on the legal certainty for children and adults in cross border situations. We definitely believe that it is good for the status and position of children to remain stable in cross border situations. So we are happy to see that we give attention to the enforcement and acceptance of authentic instruments and judgments. Also, we think it is good that we continue with technical negotiations. At the moment, we do not want to preempt our final position on this file because it may be different depending on how the negotiations go on. When it comes to our ability to support the compromise, there are two elements that are decisive. Firstly, it is a clear definition of the scope and key concepts and corresponding legal effects. We want to have a text that is legally clear, reduces the risk of divergent interpretations and which prevents the abuse of cross border situations. Secondly, rules have to be understandable, predictable, and also workable in practice for all competent authorities because the rules are not only going to be applied by courts, but also by other authorities, including civil registries. So if we do not have clear rules, there is a risk of fragmentation in application, which would undermine the very objective of the proposal. Experience shows that if a matter is so sensitive, we shouldn't rush and seek a solution that is sustainable in the long term and acceptable to all member states. I think that the best way forward is to look for a compromise and be guided by the best interest of the child and legal certainty throughout the union. So we remain engaged in technical negotiations, we are ready to find an agreement. Thank you.”
  Jurisdiction conflicts between EU and national courts
• “Thank you for the floor, Maria, and thank you for including this extremely important point on the agenda of our meeting. I appreciate that the European Commissioner took an active approach and prepared the action plan for fertilizers. The current situation is very complex, there are no simple solutions. We have to help our farmers as quickly as possible or, prices of food will increase significantly and production, capacity will drop. Regarding the measures, for CAP strategic plan, this is not a solution for me. The reason is the long term nature of the commitment of funds in the plan. This does not allow for a swift response. It's clear that the existing financial tools will not be sufficient, and I don't think it's a good idea to resolve it through a clash of national budgets. I view the submissions of the temporary framework as, something positive, and it is certain that we are in the right direction, but national funds will not be enough. The key is to utilize other funds from the European budget, in particular, the announced increase in the agricultural reserve. This is linked to the necessary discussion regarding the source of additional funds. We have to focus on improving the availability of fertilizers and also on strengthening our independence and supporting domestic fertilizer production. We have to diversify fertilizer sources and also strive for marketing transparency through monitoring supply chains. Temporary duty free tariffs quotas for selected types of fertilizers are a suitable stabilizing measure. I think, this is a crisis related, solution. We have to support seeking new alternatives, the use of digestate from biogas plants, fertilizers of biological origin or nutrient recycling. Given the plan of the EU and also of The Czech Republic for a significant increase, The use of digestate is highly promising. We welcome the submissions proposal to support carbon farming, using revenues from the emission trading system. However, if we want to achieve the objectives of the action plan, priority must be put on storing carbon in, the agricultural soil. And given the significant regional differences instead of, the announced Europe wide call for carbon agriculture projects, we should prefer calls, at the national or regional level. We don't have much time before the next season starts, we have to really speed up.”
  Use of fertilisers
• “00:19 – 12:02:39): Mister chairman, mister commissioner, distinguished colleagues, The Czech Republic, as well as myself personally consider the competitiveness of freight rail transport of importance. The rail freight transport accounts for a significant potential for decarbonization. However, its proportion stagnates or sometimes even decreases. Currently, it accounts for about 17 of inland freight transport in The EU, while 3 quarters of the volume are covered by road transport. If we want to meet EU's climate objectives and make our economies more competitive, we need to prepare the conditions for growth in the rail sector. Therefore, we call for coordinated approach in the EU in preparing a strategic framework for rail transport development, particularly investing in rail transport infrastructure, TNT freight network, terminals, capacities for freight transport, as well as supporting multimodal transport, digitization and interoperability of the network. At the same time, we must seek solutions to benefit from decarbonization and boosting its competitiveness. We believe that through joint efforts, we can reverse the current negative trend. Rail freight transport is not only a part of the climate policies. It is a prerequisite for competitive industry resilient supply chain and prosperity of the EU in the long term. I would like to thank Austria, Belgium, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Greece, Romanian, and also Spain for supporting this initiative as well as all those who will join it. Thank you.”
  EU support of rail transport
• “Hello. Good morning. We thank the Spanish presidency for its efforts made so far in the work on this draft directive. The Czech Republic sees the importance of harmonising the rules of national insolvency frameworks, [00:10:30] and at the same time supports the maximum flexibility of the text of the proposal in the part concerning avoidance actions. We hope that a consensus can be found at working level, in particular on the legal consequences of the use of avoidance actions in order to ensure the least invasive intervention in national rules, and at the same time to meet the objectives of the directive. Thank you.”
  Jurisdiction conflicts between EU and national courts
• “Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. Dear Ernest. Yes, you pronounce it correctly. Ceské Budejovice. It is quite difficult to pronounce it. So thank you very much for informing you very briefly about [00:12:30] the successful competition for the title of European Capital of Culture for 2020 eight inches the Czech Republic. So we have four cities that entered this competition Ceské Budejovice, Brno, Broumov and liberates the second round, considered only two cities, Ceské Budejovice and Broumov. And in June this year the final round of selection was successfully held, and the winner is Ceské Budejovice. The international panel [00:13:00] appreciated the deepening of the artistic vision, the development of the European dimension, and the overall high quality concept of the candidacy that the Czechs presented in the second round. The project is built on permaculture and that means a synergy between artists, cultural organisations, local residents and international guests. So Cesca Boljevici wants to promote [00:13:30] the cultural activity. And the idea is that Boljevici is a city where the cultural landscape, natural environment and culture have always co-existed in symbiosis. To achieve this ambitious goal, the candidacy is based on three principles care enhancing cultural accessibility, connect increasing residents sense of belonging to their living environments, and create encouraging cross-disciplinary collaboration [00:14:00] while promoting a culture of co-creation. So I know from my personal experience that this process is very demanding and I believe that we have it's well managed to go through this many years endeavor, and in 2028 there will become a. City, European Capital of Culture, and I believe Jessica will [00:14:30] be able to present that program when it's finally ready.”
  EU and national cultural identities
• “I would like to answer your two question to the first one. We firmly believe that the primary duty to provide compensation should be placed on the perpetrator, as this approach can also have an educational [00:42:30] impact. In this context, it is important to acknowledge the financial implications for the state, which greatly surpass any potential gains. We consider, and this appears to be an effective approach in the Czech Republic, that the victim can be supported in satisfying his claim, for example, by securing a claim on the property of the accused before the judgment in the case is handed down, or by the possibility of [00:43:00] satisfying his claim. For from the funds obtained from the criminal sanction imposed on the offender. To your second question, the Czech Republic supports the development of a targeted and coordinated approach to the provision of services for children. However, as in most of the proposed measures, the state is limited by insufficient financial possibilities and also [00:43:30] by the lack of professionals who would be able to ensure the provision of the required services on a virtually continuous basis. Therefore, we believe that the provision should be targeted primarily at children who are most in need of such services, primarily children as victims of sexual and domestic violence. Alongside this, we believe that more flexibility is more than necessary. [00:44:00] Thank you.”
  EU policy on victims' compensation rights
• “Thank you for the floor. Uh, dear Madam Minister, madam Commissioner, colleagues, uh, first of all, allow me to appreciate the Commission's work for securing a standalone research and Innovation Framework programme under the next MFF, which is highly appreciated by the research community both in my country and in the EU as a whole. My sincere thanks also go to the Danish Presidency for smooth and transparent negotiations on the future FP ten. The progress report reflects the hard work of the Presidency and Member States. Well, we were aligning our positions and identifying key topics while showing that both political decisions are still needed in the months to come. I welcome the structure of the programme if it is balanced between basic and applied research, complemented by strong focus on innovation and close to the market activities. The boosted budget would allow us to strengthen unique European instruments such as the European Research Council, European Innovation Council, Marie Sklodowska actions, research infrastructures and many more which have proven their strong European values. And the debate shows that this is a view shared by many of us. Recently, we completed a comprehensive process to define our priorities and objectives for the second cycle of the European Research Area Policy agenda, which will result in 19 priority objectives that provide a strong foundation for future work.”
  Research priorities within the EU
• “Thank you very much for giving me the floor. And thank you for placing this debate on the agenda of today's council meeting in the Czech Republic. We are currently looking at food prices and the distribution of value between the different actors in the agri food chain, which also results from relations between suppliers and buyers. The issue of food prices is very important to me and for us as a government, it's very high on our priority list. I therefore appreciate the preparation of the report on the evaluation of the Unfair Trading Practices Directive, and thank the Commissioner for presenting it as a preliminary remark. I think it's important in the further discussion to primarily focus on the strengthening of the position of farmers and small suppliers in the agri food chain. In addition, it will be necessary to reconsider the introduction of market power assessments not only for buyers but also for suppliers, and to simplify the assessment of market power on the basis of the turnover criterion. The issue of below cost or sub purchase prices in shops, and their impact on the agri food chain will be certainly important as well. There will be many challenges that will lie ahead of us. As an example, I can mention territorial restrictions on trade, speeding up proceedings by reducing administrative burden, and so on. It's possible to consider the inclusion of a general clause against unfair practices in the directive. In any case, I can promise a constructive approach by the Czech Republic. Thank you.”
  EU policy on farmer–buyer relations in the agri-food supply chain
• “Regarding the second question in come, diversification for land managers would be helped by fairness of the ecosystem service provision. With regard to the link between biomass and food security, the Czech Republic's priority is to maintain sustainable domestic biomass mass production and minimize carbon leakage and losses in soil fertility. We would also like to express our support to Hungary regarding the importance of the Bio East initiative, as stated in the Draft Council conclusions. We ask the Commission to support these regional activities and to carry out a comprehensive assessment of their impact. Finally, we'd like to thank the presidency for taking most of our comments into account in the debate on the respective conclusions. However, I would like to emphasize that in the discussion on forestry, we do not support any proposals to strengthen harmonization and certification. This would interfere with the powers of Member States in this area, and we would therefore like to avoid any language that would suggest such steps. Thank you for your attention.”
  Management of EU forests
• “Dear executive vice president, dear Nico Demos, dear colleagues, we would like to thank the presidency for post border digital interaction while at the same time allowing sufficient flexibility to ensure functioning of the European business wallets as as the national level at the national level. Upcoming trail dialogue is essential to preserve this balance, in particular, to flexibility reflected in article 16 and to amendment timeline for implementation of this regulation. At the same time, to ensure a well founded and workable framework, it will be crucial to further clarify number of technical aspects. Also, we would like to encourage the commission to provide further clarity on the sectoral deployment and use of the business wallets. The commission's support is particularly important in light of the numerous references to European business wallet in other legislative proposals and would facilitate the interpretation of technical aspects in sector specific environment. To conclude, we believe that these issues can be further addressed in the next process of negotiation, and, therefore, we can fully support to propose a general approach. T”
  Electronic identity
• “I'm not sure if I should carry on in Spanish. I will try and say a few words in Spanish. Just to start, we do appreciate the work of the Spanish presidency in general. Excellent work. And [00:36:00] I think you've been doing it on for the good of all Europeans. Talking about this specific piece of legislation. Let me just say. War industry in Europe and public is expecting from this, I think is key, and I'm very happy that we are talking about this now. We're talking about innovation [00:36:30] and seeing European companies flourish, and that's what we need. And now, if I may. I'll switch to English.”
  Defence spending
• “For example, the issue of comitology, the role and form of programme committees and the involvement of Member States in the priority setting process. Another key area we need much more information for the negotiations is the issue of European research partnerships. It is essential that we have the processes for the identification. Selection, implementation is clearly defined, and member states need to play a significant role in all phases of the process. So there are legitimate concerns that without the timely presentation of the proposed processes, we can have certain delay. And last but not least, what is also important, what I still like when negotiating this package are the provisions relating to the issue of widening. I'm convinced that these provisions should be discussed in our council configuration, and that is also in the working party on research, because it is the only body with relevant expertise. So without these discussions, we cannot achieve the partial general approach. So the Czech Republic would like to remove the brackets of the relevant provisions and start discussion in the Research working group as soon as possible. Thank you.”
  EU-level coordination of research agendas
• “Due to this problem, the cultivation areas of some crops are already decreasing in our country and the situation will continue to worsen. At the same time, there is a legal framework that provides the option that can preserve irreplaceable active substances under clearly defined rules. Examples include risk reduction measures, new application technologies, and restricted use. For these reasons, I urge the Commission to use the option of temporary approval of a substance in cases where no alternatives exist in the European Union. The use of this procedure and further simplification is important. We shouldn't wait for omnibus and simplification packages, but for active substances that includes fruits and other crops, cereals, other crops are the exception should be in use for available substances before we have real efficient alternatives. If we are unable to provide effective protection for agricultural crops, our farmers will stop growing them and we will need to import these crops. However, the impact on the agriculture can be even worse. And that, I think we can agree, is something that we have to put a lot of focus on. Thank you for your attention and thank you to the European Commission for taking this. For bearing this in mind. Thank you.”
  EU policy on pesticides
• “Thank you very much for the floor. The Czech Republic is fully aware of the challenges the ocean needs to face, whether it is the climate change, diversity, loss, pollution, security threats or illegal fishing As the new IPB report emphasizes, problems are interlinked and it requires a systemic approach. Although we are a landlocked country, we see protection and restoration of the ocean health as an integral part of our shared responsibility, and it is a key element of a healthy planetary system. In line with our global commitments under the Convention on Biological Diversity and its upcoming Montreal Global Framework, I therefore support the effort to ensure oceans are safe, clean and managed sustainably. I also fully support the EU's effort in the international context. I consider it important to better coordinate and integrate ocean governance, link maritime and land based policies and strengthen capacities for effective implementation and monitoring. Emphasis should be placed on an ecosystem approach and the use of nature based solutions and considerations of cumulative impacts. Again, as a landlocked country, Czechia has also an impact on the health of seas and oceans by improving the quality of water in rivers and lakes. In this context, international river basin organizations play an irreplaceable role in coordinating the protection and sustainable use of shared rivers. We are involved in different activities and international commissions of protection of the Elbe, Oder and Danube rivers. These commissions are successfully contributing to reducing the input of pollution and hence less pollutants and nutrients. Get into the seas. I welcome efforts to improve the quality of ocean research by expanding existing research and observation tools and activities. I also support measures to promote the competitiveness of the EU. I also appreciate the adequate emphasis on the security dimension and considerations of the related risks. Thank you.”
  Water pollution
• “Thank you for giving me the floor. Colleagues, I would like to confirm that the adoption of new legislation remains our priority. I can join the words of Luis and Jose Manuel. We do need to realize that in this area we are unfortunately losing edge, and we very much lag far behind the world's powers. Our commission mentioned competitiveness and sustainability. New breeding techniques are definitely one of the tools, which can be very helpful. On behalf of the Czech Republic, I can promise a constructive approach in further negotiations. I believe that the February text, which was introduced by the Spanish presidency, should be the basis for our debate and we should ideally conclude it as soon as possible. Lots of luck to the Polish presidency during the work on this proposal, and I look forward to concluding this very swiftly.”
  New Genomic Techniques
• “Good afternoon, colleagues. Thank you very much. First of all, I would like to thank the Swedish and Spanish presidencies for their work on this [00:15:30] proposal. And I would like to thank all delegations in their efforts to find a compromise, while ensuring that the stated objectives will respect the different starting positions and conditions in member States for the Czech Republic. Urban wastewater treatment is a very sensitive issue because it has to do with many requirements and the need for significant [00:16:00] investment in infrastructure. Over the past 20 years, the Czech Republic has invested billions in the constructions of wastewater treatment plants. Eu funds were used for this. In many cases, these plants are now about halfway through their lifespan, and we therefore appreciate the postponement of the deadlines for meeting some of the requirements, thanks to which these investments won't go down in value. I can therefore say that from the point of view of the Czech Republic, it has been possible to eliminate most of the problematic parts of the text and adjust the targets and deadlines sent to realistic economic, administrative and personnel possibilities. We would prefer greater flexibility in article 11 on energy neutrality in the use of energy from external sources, up to 40% of total energy. But we appreciate the new presidency compromise proposal, which in our view goes in the right direction. The Czech Republic and the interest of an agreement can [00:17:00] support the text. However, I would like to stress that more investments will be needed for the implementation of this proposal, and we will have to use all sources of financing, including the cohesion funds. And I would like to wish the presidency the best of luck in their discussions with the European Parliament, and [00:17:30] I hope that the final text will be identical or very similar to the one that we are deliberating now.”
  Water pollution
• “Dear colleagues, I am pleased I can be here with you today, even though I am not responsible for this Council information as a Minister of Transport. The Euro seven proposal is part of my portfolio. Therefore, I wanted to be present during the meeting today and reflect on this legislation [00:08:30] which is of great importance for the European automotive industry. Thanks to huge efforts of the Spanish Presidency, we have come a long way from the Commission's original proposal, which was unrealistic and simply not feasible for us to implement. We have always expressed concerns about the impact the regulation might have on the industry, accessibility of mobility for our citizens, economic growth and jobs. Since [00:09:00] our automotive sector employs more than half a million of workers in the Czech Republic. I also consider it important to ensure the competitiveness of the European Union. It's clear that the world is moving towards zero emissions mobility. We see that electric cars share is increasing in Europe, but the transition must be smooth and gradual without excessive regulation and measures that would put the European automotive sector in jeopardy [00:09:30] on the global scale. In this context, I would like to very much appreciate the work of the presidency. It's a great achievement to find a compromise on such an important and also politically sensitive topic. I would like to thank the Presidency for reflecting the concerns of the Czech Republic and the common position of the like minded countries. [00:09:54] The proposal has been largely reversed and I am very pleased that the testing methods and [00:10:00] limits are now more realistic and mostly aligned with Euro six standards. This legislation introduces new elements, particularly new standards for brakes and tires emissions that will significantly contribute to our climate goals. This is also the case for the onboard monitoring system, where a balanced solution has been found eventually. The details of the implementation of these new elements will be defined [00:10:30] in the secondary legislation. This is the reason why we ask for a specific lead time for implementation. Once we have a full picture of the requirements. 18 months for new types and 30 months for all. Registrations for both light and heavy duty vehicles is at the edge of the limit of what we can bear. But in the spirit of compromise, we are ready to accept the presidency proposal. To conclude, we are aware [00:11:00] that the text we have on the table now is a very delicate compromise, but in our view, it represents a balanced regulation that provides industry with fair and predictable conditions. As I am also very pleased that the possible negative impact on the mobility of our citizens linked with affordability of the cars for all our citizens has been significantly reduced. Therefore, the Czech Republic is in the position to endorse a general [00:11:30] approach today. Thank you for the attention.”
  Road transport environmental policy
• “Thank you. Chair. I will be very brief. We thank our Swedish colleagues for their initiative, which we strongly [00:06:00] support. Level playing field is the basis of the single market. Therefore, any interference in it needs to be thoroughly justified, temporary and targeted at the affected sector. This goes for the state aid in particular. Thank you.”
  State Aid
• “Thank you. We would like to thank the presidency for all her work on the package. We appreciate the commission's aim to increase EU cyber resilience by the new proposal. Strengthening the ENISA role in supporting member states can be an important help. This relationship between ENISA and member states is not fragmentation. It's necessary for the playing field for cybersecurity. Building on the work started in 2022, in recent adoption of the ICT supply chain toolbox, we look forward to continuing the discussion of the EU approach to ICT supply chain security. We hope to find a well-balanced, risk-based, and business-oriented approach with the strong role of member states respecting their competencies in national security. Such approach should contribute to security across the EU, promote competitiveness, and reflect national frameworks and needs. Thank you.”
  Scope of EU cybersecurity obligations
• “And thank you to your presidency for bringing this crucial topic up for a political debate. The good condition of the European automotive industry is an economic priority for us. It employs hundreds of hundreds of thousands of people in the Czech Republic and drives innovation. The current government is categorically as opposed to regulations that would effectively end the safety of new vehicles with combustion engines. We aim for realistic regulation that balances climate ambitions with the real market. Technological and social economic conditions, and preserves the EU's competitiveness. We therefore see this revision as an opportunity to fundamentally adjust the framework, which is too ambitious. The Czech Republic will strive for technological, technologically neutral regulation that will allow the registration of new vehicles with combustion engines beyond 2035. We fully support it. We fully support the Italian Non-paper, which we have joined more specifically on the commission's proposal. The targets for 2030 and 2035 remain very ambitious. They. They do not reflect the still low demand for electric vehicles. The global geopolitical situation and the availability of of vehicles for citizens. The proposed 90% for 2035 is a step in the right direction. But it's not. It is not enough. Moreover, the flexibilities may not fully compensate for the remaining 10%. Given the design of the penalty system. This would expose manufacturers to unacceptably high fines and we must prevent this. Are the flexibilities for sustainable fuels and low carbon materials must be available even before 2030. To send a timely investment signal, they should include all fuels under the Red directive and broader technology neutral definition of materials, including including aluminium.”
  Road transport environmental policy · 2035 ICE phase-out: strict zero-emission target vs. flexibility for carmakers
• “Yeah. Thank you for the presentation of the program of your presidency. We truly appreciate the effort and work that has been put into the program. And indeed, Hungary has taken over the presidency in under very challenging circumstances. We welcome in particular that competitiveness has a prominent place in your presidency program. We are also pleased that the Hungarian presidency puts emphasis on the rule of law in both horizontal and specific discussions, including those that we will have today with the with the candidate countries. We equally appreciate your dedicated focus on migration, Specifically the external dimension, innovative ideas and returns, and we also appreciate the emphasis on the defense policy. However, we believe that some priorities which are crucial for Europe at the current juncture, are not sufficiently accentuated in the programme. First of all, support of Ukraine. It is one of the top priorities of the EU to support Ukraine in its defence against Russia's aggression, and it is crucial that we stay united. It's a key geopolitical challenge, a challenge for Europe. However, it is only marginally represented in the presidency programme. Second, full scale enlargement. We truly appreciate that enlargement is one of your priorities, and it is in this council configuration that that we should maintain the momentum of the enlargement policy. However, this should not be limited only to the Western Balkan countries, but also to candidate countries to the east of the EU. And we miss any. Explicit reference to Ukraine, the Republic of Moldova or Georgia in your presidency programme. Czechia hopes that that that in particular for the Ukraine and the Republic of Moldova, there will be progress this autumn. Lastly, I would like to recall that the role and competences of of of a presidency, that it is to represent the common EU interests, especially in foreign affairs, security and defence policy, by following decisions made by the European Council and the Council of the EU. Let me conclude by expressing our sincere hope that Hungary will successfully manage all the difficult tasks ahead, and you can count on on our support in this regard.”
  EU enlargement
• “Thank you Max. I welcome the goals of this proposals. We should definitely aim to improve and further develop supplementary pension schemes. We should strive to make them more transparent and efficient. I also support the exchange of best practices in this field. At the same time, it is important to respect national competences with regard to tax incentives and social security. Therefore, tax matters must be discussed separately within a forum of tax experts while maintaining unanimity. Thank you.”
  EU policy on aging workforce and pensions
• “52:53 – 10:53:53): Thank you for the floor. We thank the commission for presenting proposal. While we explicitly welcome some elements, we would like to share the following suggestion for further work. In radio spectrum management, the procedures and licensing provisions must be bring practical feasibility and take into account to national interests of our member states. The single passport procedure should be significantly simplified and responsibilities should be assigned where they can be carried out to most efficiently. Regarding to copper network phase out, the risk of liability arising from the proposed ban on the use of existing copper networks should be reconsidered. In this regard, we remain committed to work on the text in the future. Thank you.”
  Radio equipment (common charger)
• “Thank you for giving me the floor. Madam chair, on behalf of the Czech Republic, I would like to support the initiative by Poland and also Estonia. We support the call for a technical discussion on the proposed obligation to include sowing seeds. In the definition of the use of plant protection products, we must strive to reduce administrative burden and avoid any increase in competitiveness and competence requirements for seasonal workers. We are in short supply of them. We must always first consider whether the benefits of the proposed measure outweigh the complications associated with its implementation. I also fully agree that in addition to biocontrol substances, we need to ensure the availability of conventional crop protection solutions. This is how we can contribute to the economic stability of the agricultural sector. This is linked to the necessary activation of article 47 of the regulation on the Authorisation of Low Risk Plant Protection Products. It is necessary to shorten the deadlines for approved processes, and to extend the deadlines for the mandatory review of substances in use to continue, failing to guarantee farmers that they have a reliable and sufficiently broad portfolio of plant protection products is not acceptable. During discussions on Plant Protection omnibus, we must support all measures preventing further losses of active substances for which substitutes are not available. We are fully ready to support these initiatives and contribute to them. Thank you.”
  EU policy on pesticides
• “Thank you for the floor, Madam Chair. I'd also like to thank the presidency for including this item on the agenda. On behalf of the Czech Republic, I would like to stress that we must not neglect fresh water aquaculture and its entire value chain. The future energy transition roadmap must reconcile environmental ambitions with the economic reality of operators. This is the only way to ensure successful and viable transition. In responding to our first question, we have serious doubts as to whether the decarbonisation of the sector can be achieved, in particular due to the significant reduction of funds within the next MFF. There are many investment needs and we need to very carefully choose our priorities as regards the level playing field. We are concerned that the proposed financial architecture could lead to uneven competition among producers in the EU. In responding to your second question, the energy transition aquaculture will require very high investments. It is not realistic to expect that SMEs will have to bear the main financial burden and therefore we need to ensure stable, productive environment. As for business models here, the Czech Republic thinks it is crucial that both the EU and member states contribute to reducing investment risks. The sector is very specific, and we need to create an investment environment that significantly reduces risks and encourages capital inflows. We would also like to stress that energy transition must be realistic, must be fair and economically viable. Otherwise, it could jeopardise competitiveness and long term sustainability of the entire sector. And finally, I'd like to briefly comment on the dialogue on measures for small scale and coastal fisheries. We believe that it would be beneficial to open a structured dialogue also for freshwater agriculture of landlocked countries. Such a dialogue would allow to identify and address common challenges, taking into account the sector specific operating conditions. Thank you.”
  Funding for fisheries and aquaculture
• “The European Competitiveness Fund is another area where getting the sequencing right really matters. The ECF General Committee, made up of member states representatives, should be the body setting the direction. Comitology comes after that, not before. More broadly, they genuinely welcome the ECF as a tool for boosting competitiveness, prosperity and security across the EU. And we agree with everyone who is calling for the ECF to be made available to all Member States. Global Europe is yet another instrument where the Council needs to be firmly in the picture, not just during planning but throughout implementation, monitoring and performance assessment. Strategic and political guidance from the council upfront is essential, not optional. Czech Republic considers it essential to respect the treaties. The interinstitutional balance and the established roles of each institution, including within the legislative and budgetary procedures. We should build on existing practice and framework. French explained that very well, but also others mentioned it. If introduced, it should be carefully designed to bring clear added value and possibly simplify the budgetary procedure. We must avoid duplicating the existing procedure.”
  Conditions to access EU budget
• “Good morning. So, as you know, the situation of the European Union from the point of view of the industrial segment is really not very well. We are losing competitiveness, and that's why we support the overall objectives of the Industrial Accelerator Act, to preserve the competitiveness of European industry. But at the same time, we cannot forget that other key problems for industry. First, we must provide reasonable energy prices. It's really the biggest problem right now. As you know, the energy prices in the US, there are 4 or 5 times better than in the European Union. And that's the reason the companies are moving to America or to, to to China. And for that we need reform. Eu U. E. T. F. Then we must be realistic and technologically neutral. It's essential to reflect the real conditions of different member states, especially from the point of view of the different energy mix of industrial infrastructure, supply chains and and of course, access to low carbon materials and technologies made in Europe. Rules must not be must be proportionate, clear and easy to to implement. They must preserve market openness and and respect international value value chains. We welcome that. The proposal includes our trust partners as a part of Made in Europe. But we must also take into account the specific needs of individual sectors such as automotive or nuclear. Thank you very much.”
  Energy (green transition)
• “38:33 – 11:41:13): Dear madam chair, dear commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, in Czechia, we see youth friendliness as a set of concrete standards that shape how public institutions work with young people. It reflects our priorities of intergenerational fairness, inclusion, and structured cooperation. And at its core, it is about connecting participation, data collection, and impact evaluation into one continuous process. A good example is our ministerial youth panel. It is based on a publicly available charter that clearly sets out its purpose, principles, and way of working. This helps young people understand what they can influence, how they can contribute, and how their input is used in policymaking. The youth panel is not a one-off initiative. It is a continuous mechanism where young people identify issues, co-create solutions, and develop recommendations together with policymakers. A key priority for us is inclusion and equal access. We actively reach out to young people who may face barriers to participation, whether because of socioeconomic background, where they live, disability, or other disadvantages. We also adapt the way we work so that participation is genuinely possible for them. In Czechia, youth friendliness across sectors is enshrined in the competence act, which defines ministerial responsibilities. While this provides a clear structure, it also means that progress in youth related areas often depends on cooperation across ministries. To support this, we have launched a national project that brings youth participation into policymaking in a more systematic way. It offers ministries a ready to use model, including facilitation, methodology, and organizational support while requiring a clear commitment to actually using the outcomes in policy work. Looking ahead to the next EU youth strategy, we would welcome a stronger focus on measuring real policy impact and closing the feedback loop so that young people can see how their input shapes decisions. We also see value in further developing digital participation tools, evidence based policymaking, and clear accountability mechanisms. Finally, peer learning and practical capacity building will remain essential for strengthening youth friendly governance based on intergenerational solidarity. Thank you very much.”
  Gender roles, equality and inclusion
• “38:21 – 14:41:03): As I said, we believe that competitiveness is a key priority. And for the single market to work, this is an important condition. And so this is what we need to focus on in the budget. We need to maintain a strong long term policy based on the treaties. The way they contribute to lowering disparities and the, strength and competitiveness, that is without a doubt. When it comes to the CAP, we believe that the commission's proposal doesn't go in this way. It could lead back to renationalization to, of the agriculture policies, and that could affect fair competitiveness in inside the into a single market as a consequence. So what I think is the friends of cohesion, but also the states who support the competitiveness fund have the same objective in mind. What is important here is if we strengthen prosperity of the EU, if we want to strengthen safety with a directly managed programs, it needs to lead to a balanced situation across the EU. We can't create islands that are more and less developed when it comes to member states, but also territories or regions within those states. Connectivity needs to also be physical. That has been said before. So we emphasize modern transport and energy connections. So those are tools such as, the CEF 3 in the next period. And to conclude, I think deciding on the budget can be efficient facing the different trends and development is if we respect the roles of the institutions the way they are set out in the treaties. We believe we need to maintain this and maintain a strong opposition of the council as possible. Thank you. Thank you. And Benjamin followed by Slovenia and Latvia. Thank you, Marilyn. I'll switch to French.”
  Cohesion and rural funding
• “Thank you Louise. So this is our overview of the proposal. For a long time we've been supporting this. And we would like to thank you for this initiative. We fully [00:14:30] understand the need to improve animal welfare during transport. However, I need to point out that to maintain stable agricultural production and competitiveness of our farmers at the world market is key and that goes hand in hand with transport. That's why what we see as problematic are the requirements in the area of temperature and space, and the total time of transportation to slaughterhouses. [00:15:00] And also when we are transporting calves, it is necessary for these changes to be gradual, and that needs to be a sufficiently long transition period to reflect the conditions in individual member states. Harmonisation of welfare of dogs and cats across the EU is something that we've been missing for a long time. That's why we already have national legislation that is rather strict, and it's quite similar to what has been submitted today. As for [00:15:30] acquisition of dogs and cats from places with unfavourable conditions, it is necessary to raise awareness amongst general public as for breeding animals exclusively or mainly for their fur. I have to emphasise that we've introduced the ban in the Czech Republic back in 2019. Thank you.”
  EU requirements on animal welfare for farmers
• “It is essential to address it in its eternity as a part of the text, remain bracketed and compromise requires a comprehensive approach. It should be the research working party that seeks a compromise on the remaining key issues, including horizontal provisions, provisions, instruments for widening and transition countries and post 2030 conditionality. These principles should be anchored in the legislative text, while implementation details can be further specified in the work programmes. Czechia supports the evolutionary approach and the division of widening countries into two categories, in our view. Both groups should retain access to all instruments with differentiated conditions favouring core widening countries. The text on horizontal principles should be carefully calibrated to send the right message and reflect the joint position of the 12 member states. In conclusion, we fully support the presidency's efforts to maintain momentum and reach a partial general approach before summer, enabling the start of negotiations with the European Parliament. We remain constructive and ready to assist in finding the best possible solution to ensure the success of the program. Thank you for your attention.”
  EU political integration
• “To make this work, we need a consistent approach across the whole program, not fragmented or ad hoc solutions. Researchers and innovators must know exactly where the limits are clear and uniform rules will provide certainty and prevent unnecessary duplication or confusion. We must also ensure that new activities do not undermine international cooperation or discourage the potential association of like minded third countries. International collaboration is one of the biggest strengths of Horizon Europe. Another key aspect, as mentioned by many of my colleagues is security in research. Europe needs clear requirements for risk assessment, reliable tools for managing sensitive data, and strong ethical guidance. Only then can researchers work with confidence that their projects align with European values. And finally, dual use funding should not crowd out traditional civilian priorities. It must complement them by bringing added value and synergies for the whole research landscape. Czechia is ready to contribute constructively to shaping this approach, one that strengthens Europe while keeping our research open, ethical and trustworthy. Thank you very much.”
  Strategic Screening in International Research Cooperation
• “Thank you, chair, for giving me the floor and for the possibility to discuss aspects of the future cap and food security. We welcome the added focus on this topic. There is a clear link between how the support is designed and successful food security in the EU. When a special situation, foodstuffs represent a strategic commodity, but on the other hand, we weaken financial resources. We must be pragmatic. We must look for all possible ways to compensate these cuts. We must ensure maximum flexibility so that Member States can respond to local needs. We are in the first stage of the negotiations. We believe that Cap should be, in the future, separate and adequately financed common policy. Only that can contribute to food security. Not only EU, but globally. Also. For this reason, we fully support the information from Italy and we would like to express our thanks for that. Food security also needs to be looked at in light of the future legislative framework. We fully agree with the fact that the support must be targeted at those farmers who primarily produce food. We cannot agree with ending support for farmers in pensionable age, which would be discriminatory in the current situation. We cannot afford such a measure. Also, differentiated design of basic support can only be effective if member states have sufficient flexibility.”
  Direct payments to farmers (pillar 1)
• “12:18 – 12:13:01): Colleagues, we fully support the Austrian proposal. We join this initiative. The preservation and further development of the railways industry in the EU is an important condition for our competitiveness. I think that is all that we need to say here. We need to preserve our competitiveness. And without the railways industry and without its further development and investments, just like our Spanish colleagues said, without it, there's no point in discussing it any further. Thank you.”
  EU support of rail transport
• “Madam Commissioner, dear colleagues, let me start by thanking the Polish presidency for opening this important debate. We all consider it essential not only for steering the remaining period of Horizon Europe, but also for shaping its successor after 2027. From Czechia's perspective, the interim evaluation of Horizon Europe brings several key findings. It confirms the need for programme simplification, greater transparency and, above all, more balanced geographical participation. We see these aspects as essential for the design of the next Framework programme. The Framework Programme must be open, competitive and truly European that is accessible across all regions. Excellence and cohesion are not contradictory. In fact, their combination is a necessary condition for a successful European research area. In this context, we strongly support the continuation and reinforcement of widening instruments, stronger synergies with cohesion policy and targeted support for capacity building. At the same time, it is crucial to ensure that flagship schemes such as the European Research Council and Marie Sklodowska-Curie action remain remain world class and competitive. Small and medium sized enterprises are the backbone of our economies, and their active participation in the Framework Programme is vital. The European Innovation Council accelerator targets deep tech companies with high growth potential by offering a combination of grants and financial instruments.”
• “For example, the issue of comitology, the role and form of programme committees and the involvement of Member States in the priority setting process. Another key area we need much more information for the negotiations is the issue of European research partnerships. It is essential that we have the processes for the identification. Selection, implementation is clearly defined, and member states need to play a significant role in all phases of the process. So there are legitimate concerns that without the timely presentation of the proposed processes, we can have certain delay. And last but not least, what is also important, what I still like when negotiating this package are the provisions relating to the issue of widening. I'm convinced that these provisions should be discussed in our council configuration, and that is also in the working party on research, because it is the only body with relevant expertise. So without these discussions, we cannot achieve the partial general approach. So the Czech Republic would like to remove the brackets of the relevant provisions and start discussion in the Research working group as soon as possible. Thank you.”
  EU-level coordination of research agendas
• “Do you want the Czech Republic would like to support the Swedish proposal. We see the agenda of sperm and egg donors as deserving our attention, while adopting of the regulation of substances of human origin significantly improved cooperation between national registries of donors. No cooperation is functional unless we agree on basic parameters such as, but not limited to, the number of donations per donor. In this case, we recognize the right of each member state to set its own national parameters, and we believe that we should debate a mechanism that will ensure that the national rules will be will not be surpassed by cross-border use of gametes. Thank you.”
  Sexuality and reproduction
• “Thank you. David. Dear colleagues, I welcome this point on the programme. I agree with Luis. I agree with the Spain. The European countries and farmers in them are facing a lot of challenges. We see these protests. Those are proof of that. And part [00:13:30] of this is also high environmental requirements that they are facing. And there are some negative impacts of the changes of the climate as well. If we want to respond to that, we can't resist the debate that we have here on the table right now, and we can all agree, can help solve these problems. They can ensure resilient plant varieties for our farmers. So NTS must remain the tool that we [00:14:00] take to respond to climate change in third countries. We already have plants in practice that are being used created with ND. We are still talking about the legal framework here in Europe and that's alarming. This is something that will influence our farmers into the future. It will increase dependency on third countries. So we should negotiate on the regulation on NTS. That's a clear signal that we are willing to work on farmers problems and on food security and food autonomy. Thank [00:14:30] you.”
  New Genomic Techniques